Section 4, Judicial Conduct Rules: Difference between revisions

From New Shropshire National Archives

Content added Content deleted
m (Dreichh moved page Section 4, Arbitration Rules to Section 4, Judicial Conduct Rules without leaving a redirect)
No edit summary
 
Line 9: Line 9:
## Judges may refer to a higher court in order to obtain a warrant necessary to ensure the appearance of the desired individual
## Judges may refer to a higher court in order to obtain a warrant necessary to ensure the appearance of the desired individual
### This must be done by making a request to the Supreme Council, in order for the higher court to be assigned
### This must be done by making a request to the Supreme Council, in order for the higher court to be assigned
[[Category:Arbitration Rules]]
[[Category:All Legislation]]
[[Category:All Legislation]]
[[Category:Judicial Conduct Rules]]

Latest revision as of 14:24, 12 December 2023

Judicial Conduct Rules
Revision of 2023
  1. Judges must investigate a case thoroughly, and extinguish all reasonable sources of information, before deciding on the facts of the case
  2. Where an individual necessary in the investigation of a case fails to appear before a court, warrants may be issued for their apprehension
    1. The scale of warrant differs by court:
      1. The General Tribunal and the High Court may only issue a Federal warrant, as defined by 4/3.2 RFC
      2. The Appeal Court may issue Federal or galactic warrants, as defined by 4/3.2 RFC
      3. The Judicial Committee of the Supreme Council may issue Federal, galactic, or intergalactic warrants, as defined by 4/3.2 RFC
    2. Judges may refer to a higher court in order to obtain a warrant necessary to ensure the appearance of the desired individual
      1. This must be done by making a request to the Supreme Council, in order for the higher court to be assigned
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.