Section 3, Judicial Conduct Rules: Difference between revisions
From New Shropshire National Archives
No edit summary |
m (Dreichh moved page Section 3, Arbitration Rules to Section 3, Judicial Conduct Rules without leaving a redirect) |
||
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:20, 12 December 2023
Judicial Conduct Rules |
---|
Revision of 2023
|
- Judges should follow a standard order for proceedings, as follows:
- Investigation, as explained in S4
- In this the judge should endeavour to obtain all the relevant information regarding a case
- Fact finding, as explained in S5
- In this the judge should, using the evidence gathered in the previous stage, establish the facts of the case
- Verdict, as explained in S6
- In this, the judge should decide whether the facts of the case establish, on balance of probabilities, that an offence was committed and the accused committed it
- The judge should then find a verdict of guilty or not guilty
- Sentencing, as explained in S7
- If the accused is found guilty, the judge must pass a sentence using the rules established in S7
- Investigation, as explained in S4
- Judges should explain the stage of proceedings to participants
- It is advised that, for each stage, judges explain the case to participants using the templates providing in S8